Big brotheR
11-25-2008, 04:00 AM
Wit, pride and the resurrection: Margaret Edson's play and John Donne's poetry
Sykes, John D Jr
FOR reasons internal and external to Margaret Edson's play Wit, it is easy to miss the serious dialogue with John Donne's poetry to be found in it. Internally, the last utterance we hear from the dying scholar on the subject of her studies seems to be a rejection - she emphatically does not want to hear Donne recited to her in her extremity, preferring a children's story. Equally telling seems to be the play's condemnation of what a character calls Donne's "salvation anxiety" the endless complicating of God's simple gift of grace. Externally, audiences and reviewers seem resistant to two stark Augustinian themes sounded by the play: the recalcitrance of human pride and the utter graciousness of the Resurrection. I shall argue that far from rejecting Donne, the play grapples with these theological issues in terms largely set by Donne's divine poems.
As readers familiar with the play are aware, Wit presents us with the ordeal into which a distinguished middle-aged scholar of seventeenth century English poetry is plunged when she is diagnosed with deadly ovarian cancer. Assigned for treatment to the research hospital at her university, she is under the care of Dr. Harvey Kelekian, head of medical oncology, but she is most often attended by a former student, Jason Poser, who is now a clinical fellow in oncology, and by Susie Monahan, primary nurse for the cancer inpatient unit. During the entirety of her fatal illness, Vivian Bearing receives but one visitor: Professor E.M. Ashford, her former mentor and predecessor as eminent Donne scholar. Although she is gowned in hospital garb throughout, it is not the medical apparatus surrounding Professor Bearing that provides the primary material for reflection in the play; rather, it is the theological substance to be found in the poems she
has so often anatomized.
In order to make this case, it will be helpful to frame the texts used by Edson with two well known poems that are not quoted in the play. The first is so strikingly apropos that one might easily imagine it to be the Donnean origin of Wit; it is "Hymn to God, My God in My Sicknesse." For in that poem, the speaker, like Vivian Bearing, lies in the grip of a fatal disease from which he does not expect to recover. He describes himself stretched out,
Whilst my Physitians by their love are growne
Cosmographers, and I their Mapp, who lie
Flat on this bed, that by them may be showne
That this is my South-west discoverie
Per fretrum febris, by these streights to die (ll.6-10).
Although this second stanza of the poem is the only one to mention the
physicians, it is clear that we are to envision the entire scene as
one in which they are in close attendance as the speaker contemplates
his soul's last journey. And in view of issues which emerge in Wit,
two aspects of their relation to the patient are worthy of note. One
is that their "love" of the patient has led them to turn him into a
"Mapp." With the best of intentions, they have reduced his body to a
series of signs which they may read. Secondly, their prognosis seems
to be a given. The patient will die. The only question that frets them
is, how? By what strait will the soul make its exit from one life to
the next?
The connections between these physicians and those who attend Edson's
Donne scholar are easily drawn. Dr. Kelekian and his team know
perfectly well that patients do not survive stage four metastatic
ovarian cancer. From the time Vivian receives her diagnosis, her
prognosis is certain. Thus, their "love" for her quickly turns her
into a set of signs to be read. How long can they keep her alive? How
many chemo treatments can she withstand? What can they learn about her
"febris" as they chart her passage through it? Bearing herself is
acutely aware of the nature of this interest. And the irony of the
fact that the medical doctors are doing to her what she has so often
done to a literal text in the past is borne out to her when she is
visited on Grand Rounds. As she observes the medical observers she
muses:
Full of subservience, hierarchy, gratuitous displays, sublimated
rivalries - I feel right at home. It is just like a graduate seminar.
With one important difference: in Grand Rounds, they read me like a
book. Once I did the teaching, now I am taught. (37)
This moment of self-recognition on Dr. Bearing's part is also mirrored
in Donne's poem. For while his physicians determine the manner of his
death, Donne contemplates its meaning. And so Vivian, too, is forced
to face in existential terms what for her medical colleagues remains a
matter of research. Her attention must be turned so that she, too,
will "thinke here before" what "I must doe then."
Such a turning to the business of preparation for death is precisely
what Vivian needs. Unlike the speaker in Donne's poem, Bearing is not
ready to look beyond the horizons of the world in which she has
successfully made her way. Thus the poem is not only descriptive of
Vivian's state as an object of research laid out before her doctors;
it is also theologically prescriptive, charting the course she must
follow. Her own spiritual self-examination must be as rigorous as the
scrutiny her physicians employ. And it will be painful. As Vivian says
after eight months of treatment, "[I]t is highly educational. I am
learning to suffer" (31). Given Bearing's ironic tone it is easy to
miss the fact that here she speaks the plain truth. Within the
Augustinian context established by the Divine Poems she knows so well,
suffering, insofar as it leads to self-examination and helps to defeat
pride, is a blessing.
But "Hymne to God my God, in my sicknesse" is predictive of the play
in one final way. Unlike much of Donne's religious poetry, this poem
may be said to surmount the doubt of salvation that accompanies acute
awareness of sin.1 The central assertion of the poem is that "death
doth touch the Resurrection": just as on a world map the opposite
edges (east and west) indicate the same line, so the end of this life
is the beginning of the new. And the key to this paradox is Christ's
resurrection, the means by which, in Christian reckoning, death is
overcome by new life that utterly supplants it. The speaker in the
poem asks God to account him one of Christ's own; he prays for his
suffering to be identified with Christ's, so that he may also share in
Christ's glory ("By these thornes give me his other Crowne"). Thus
this hymn may be said to adumbrate Wit's surprising conclusion, when
Vivian Bearing's death is succeeded by a resurrection gesture: she
gets up from her deathbed, her clothes fall away from her, and she
reaches upward toward the light. In this image, indeed, "death doth
touch the Resurrection."
Since "Hymne to God my God in my sicknesse" contains both the medical
setting to be found in the play and the resurrection telos towards
which the play points, I will suggest that it also provides a fitting
motto for Vivian Bearing's spiritual pilgrimage: "Therefore that he
may raise the Lord throws down."2 Without death, there is no
resurrection. Even so, joyful allegiance to God comes only after
self-centered pride has been conquered. In the spirit of the
Augustinian tradition to which he belongs,3 Donne believes pride,
understood as rebellious indifference to God, to be the root of human
sin. And so deeply rooted is this pride that only God's intervention
cun dig it out. Since sin's reach extends throughout our being,
extracting it is painful. Adversity and even suffering thus
paradoxically become occasions for thanksgiving, for they are signs of
God's radical surgery.
This lesson, implicit in so much of Donne's work, is most boldly
taught in a second Divine Poem that Vivian does not mention. Perhaps
the most offensive of Donne's Holy Sonnets to modern sensibility is
"Batter my heart."4 For it not only condones human suffering, but
demands it from God's hand as the only corrective to sin. It is not
sufficient for God merely to "seek to mend" the speaker's heart as a
tinker might mend a pot; God must beat, fire, and remake the vessel
entirely if it is to be once again serviceable to its maker. In the
two paradoxes that close the poem the speaker asks God to "enthrall"
(enslave) him in order to free him, and to "ravish" him in order to
make him chaste. Battery, slavery, rape - these horrors of human
conduct are employed as metaphors of God's dealings with those he
loves. In a sermon, Donne provides a rationale for such unlikely love.
It is much worse for us, notes Donne, if God does not punish us than
if he does, for to be spared means that He has forgotten us. How
woeful we are if God, "forbearing to take knowledge of our
transgressions, . . . shall say of us, as he does of Israel, Why
should ye be smitten any more?" For this happens only "when God leaves
us to our selves, and studies our recovery no farther, by any more
corrections . . . ." (qtd. in Gardner 283).
This notion that suffering may indeed be a vehicle of God's mercy is
crucial to an understanding of Wit. And in fact, it may be no
coincidence that Dame Helen Gardner provides the sermon quotation
above immediately after quoting from, "If poysonous mineralls," the
Holy Sonnet that is the subject of Vivian Bearing's lecture in the
play. For both Donne and Gardner's scholarship loom large in this
work. What has largely gone unappreciated about the play in the
commentary that has so far appeared is that Professor Bearing herself
undergoes an inner religious drama remarkably like one portrayed in
the sonnets in which she is expert. Her suffering during her ordeal
with ovarian cancer and its treatment is, as Donne suggests, a means
to correction, and ultimately salvation. Just as it is difficult for
modern sensibility to accept Donne's drastic metaphors in "Batter my
heart," so audiences resist the suggestion that Vivian Bearing's
ordeal might actually be a needed antidote to that form of sin Donne
knew so well, pride. And equally startling is the gesture of
resurrection at the end of the play, which like the grace which Donne
anxiously doubts, offers the full redemption neither she nor her
doctors can supply.
In interviews, Margaret Edson has expressed mild surprise that critics
have not paid more attention to the religious aspect of her play: "The
play is about redemption, and I'm surprised no one mentions it. Grace
is the opportunity to experience God in spite of yourself, which is
what Dr. Bearing ultimately achieves" (Martini 24). Despite notable
exceptions in essays by Betty Carter and especially Martha Greene
Eads, most commentators have fastened upon the medical aspects of the
play. Victims of ovarian cancer have used it as a rallying point.
Medical professionals have employed it to discuss patient rights and
research ethics. In several American cities, sold out performances
have been followed by lengthy talk-back sessions that have focused on
these issues. The play thus seems valuable to much of its audience for
its realistic portrayal of courageous suffering and its attack on the
indifference of doctors. But Edson is right to be surprised. At its
moral center, the play is not about kindness, but redemption.
Despite what at least two critics (Iannone and Wheeler) have claimed,
there is a clear connection between the spiritual crisis Bearing faces
and the poetry she studies. Like the Donne of the Holy Sonnets, she is
unable to trust God, in large part because she lacks the humility to
do so. For example, Dr. Bearing is much more like her physicians than
unlike them. In her absorption in research she resembles Kelekian and
his research fellow Jason. Like them, she is ambitious, having worked
her way to a position of eminence in her profession, of which she is
understandably proud. Her callousness to students anticipates Jason's
indifference to bedside manner. When her former student turned
physician prepares her for a pelvic exam and leaves her, feet still in
stirrups and knees spread apart while he searches the hall for a
nurse, Vivian can only wryly register that she wishes she had given
him an "A." This observation seems to acknowledge that while power
relationships have been reversed, she has been as ruthless in her own
arena as the callow doctor. Further, her reliance upon "wit" keeps her
at a distance from others and initially increases her suffering. She
has made no friends and has no remaining family. Her only visitor is
the faculty mentor who originally inspired her, the Gardner-like Prof.
Ashford.
Thus, in the long run, her illness humiliates her in an edifying
sense, breaking down her pride to prepare her for a childlike faith.
Although Bearing does not invite God's excruciating remediation, as
Donne does when he asks God to "breake, blowe, burn and make me new,"
the ordeal of cancer ultimately has this effect on the once aloof
professor. In other words, the secularized exegete is made to follow
the Augustinian trajectory described by her subject: God raises up
only those whom he has first cast down. As terrible as it sounds to
contemporary ears accustomed to regarding suffering as pure evil,
Vivian's pain is a good thing. Her suffering brings salvation. To
borrow the title of Tim McLaurin's novel, she is cured by fire.
Taking our cue from Dr. Bearing herself, we can turn to the texts
within the text of the play to "read" the progress of her soul. The
first important text is delivered in a flashback from Bearing's
college days; it is "death, be not proud." Bearing remembers a
confrontation with her great mentor Prof. Ashford over textual
accuracy. Prof. Ashford informs the young Vivian in stern tones that
she has used the wrong edition for her paper on the most famous of the
Holy Sonnets. In the edition Vivian used, the punctuation is
incorrect. Instead of a semi-colon and exclamation point, the final
assertion of the poem should be preceded by a comma and followed by a
period: "death, thou shalt die." In this way, Ashford explains,
"Nothing but a breath - a comma - separates life from life
everlasting." The application of this point as it arises later in
connection with Vivian's illness is that death is to be accepted as a
part of life, the final victory over it having been secured. Thus, the
individual need not approach it with inflated drama. Rather, quiet
confidence is in order. Secondarily, Prof. Ashford urges her pupil to
curb her inclination to approach life's difficulties as intellectual
puzzles to be solved. After the brief lecture on textual accuracy,
Vivian mistakenly concludes that what the poem says about death is
simply a metaphysical conceit. "It's wit!" she declares. Her older and
wiser teacher disagrees. The poem, she insists, is about life and
truth. She urges Vivian to turn aside from her paper for the afternoon
and enjoy her friends, thus gaining the experience that will free her
from over-intellectualizing. But Vivian returns to the library.
The second text examined in the play is one that Prof. Bearing herself
analyzes. It is another Holy Sonnet - one in which she sees mirrored
what we come to know as her own wit-ful anxiety. In her remembered
classroom explication of "If poysonous mineralls" the professor
stresses that in Donne's poems, "metaphysical quandaries are
addressed, but never resolved" (48). The speaker in this poem, she
argues, begins with the brash certainty that God will not punish human
sin if He overlooks the deadly actions of poisons and serpents. But
the poet quickly loses his nerve. Recognizing the heinousness of his
own sin and the reality of God's judgment, he is gripped by fear, and
instead of pleading for God's mercy, asks that God forget him: "when
the speaker considers his own sins and the inevitability of God's
judgment, he can conceive of but one resolution: to disappear" (50).
What the speaker skips over, in other words, is the obvious and simple
solution that he has only to accept God's forgiveness. But this he
apparently cannot do.
We might describe the speaker's failure as a lack of faith. Unable to
escape judgment through wit, he cannot admit that God might extend the
salvation he cannot supply for himself. Rather than trust to God's
mercy, he prefers to hide. And in the course of the play, we are meant
to see that this is precisely Vivian's situation. Here we come to the
second important theological concept registered in Wit. The pride
which led her to that state of isolation characteristic of sin has but
one cure, and she cannot avail herself of it. Plainly, Vivian is a
victim of both cancer and her doctors. Equally obvious is her courage.
But most important of all is the fact that her loneliness is
self-inflicted. Like Ivan Ilych before her, but most particularly like
the Donne she creates for her students, Vivian's greatest obstacle as
she faces death is her own pride. The point is borne out in a subtle
way by the fact that immediately after the reverie in which she
recalls her lecture - indeed before she has finished it - she is
summoned out of her room for an ultrasound. "It should not be now,"
she insists. "I am in the middle of - this. I have this planned for
now, not ultrasound" (51). Since this exchange calls attention to the
intrusiveness of hospital procedures, it is easy to miss that Vivian
resents any imposition on the imperious control she has exerted over
her life. Distinguished professors are not used to having their
lectures interrupted. And it is not only physicians, but more
profoundly mortality that has wrested control from Vivian's hands.
Of course, Vivian would be mistaken to place her ultimate trust in
modern medicine. But she would be equally misguided to attempt to
regain her old autonomy. The hard spiritual lesson of her ordeal is
that her position has been false all along. This is the point of the
final text she hears - a text that is the product not of wit but of
wisdom. When Vivian's old mentor comes to visit her in her extremity,
she has with her a children's book, bought for her great-grandson. It
is this book the enfeebled Vivian wants to hear, not recitations of
Donne. This final text, explicated by Vivian's mentor, provides a neat
contrast to Vivian's own virtuoso interpretation of Donne's sonnet.
The book is simple where Donne is complex, reassuring rather than
provoking. But it is also profound, as Prof. Ashford explains, for it
is a testament to faith, and thus offers the spiritual medicine that
Vivian most needs.
This final text is The Runaway Bunny by Margaret Wise Brown. In it,
the bunny tells his mother he is going to assume a new shape and run
away. But regardless of the guises he proposes, the mother has an
answer: "'I will be a bird and fly away from you,' says the bunny. 'If
you become a bird and fly away from me,' said his mother, 'I will be a
tree you come home to.'" Finally, the would-be truant gives up:
"'Shucks,' said the little bunny, 'I might just as well stay where I
am and be your little bunny.' And so he did" (80).
The message for Vivian is twofold. First, this simple tale is an
antidote to the anxiety-producing complexity of Donne and the
competitive interpretative hubris to which Vivian and her medical
counterparts have fallen prey.5 The straightforward consolation of the
children's book is very much like that of the orange popsicle Vivian
shares with the sympathetic nurse, Susie. But secondly, the book
offers a directly theological affirmation. Prof. Ashford sees in this
tale, "A little allegory of the soul. No matter where it hides, God
will find it" (80). Thus the hopefulness of the book springs not from
human kindness, but from trust in God's overriding mercy. Not only is
the manner of the story contrary to Donne, but its content provides an
answer to the fearful sonnet explicated earlier by Prof. Bearing: it
is impossible to hide from God, but also unnecessary. One has only to
relinquish one's defenses to find the security they could never
provide.
Precisely this theological message is suggested by Prof. Ashford's
final words, and by Vivian's triumphant gesture at the conclusion of
the play. When Prof. Ashford finishes reading the book, Vivian has
drifted into a childlike sleep. Before she leaves, Prof. Ashford
pronounces what amounts to a benediction: "It's time to go. And
flights of angels sing thee to thy rest." While the Shakespeare
quotation seems strictly conventional, these words are fraught with
meaning. For it is Vivian's time to "go" as well, and the request for
angel song is a prayer for the dying consonant with the "little
allegory of the soul" we have just heard.
These words also provide the framework for Vivian's last, symbolic
action in the play. Rising from her bed, the woman we know from the
pronouncements of the medical staff to be dead walks toward a light
and begins removing her few garments. At last she lets fall her
hospital gown, and according to the stage direction, stands "naked,
and beautiful, reaching for the light" (85). Given the context of
Donne, The Runaway Bunny, and Prof. Ashford's benediction, this action
must be seen as a sign of resurrection, when as St. Paul says, "We
shall be raised incorruptible." And the fact that it is the power of
God that allows Vivian so to rise is underscored by the medical defeat
that precedes her triumphant gesture. Jason Posner, the brash young
resident, has ignored the "do not resuscitate" order on Vivian's
chart, and vainly summoned the code team. After belatedly recognizing
the order, he collapses in chagrin, and tellingly murmurs, "Oh, God,"
in unwitting testimony to the real agent of Vivian's salvation.
IN Margaret Edson's play, God eschews the manner of the hound of
heaven for the way of a mother, refusing to let us outrun the bounds
of divine love. Although Vivian Bearing's victory over the pride that
separates her from God's grace is never registered in a moment of
conscious renunciation, it is begun in her acceptance of her friends'
sympathy. And indeed, the audience has been prepared for her
transformation by an earlier moment of self-reflection that recalls
her reading of "If poysonous mineralls." After confessing her fear and
confusion to Susie, Vivian shares a popsicle with the nurse and with
her help comes to the decision not to be resuscitated should her heart
stop. Vivian comments on this exchange:
Now is not the time for verbal swordplay, for unlikely flights of
imagination and wildly shifting perspectives, for metaphysical
conceit, for wit.
And nothing would be worse than a detailed scholarly analysis.
Erudition. Interpretation. Complication.
Now is a time for simplicity. Now is a time for, dare I say it, kindness.
I thought being extremely smart would take care of it. But I see that
I have been found out. Ooohhh.
I'm scared. Oh, God. I want . . . I want . . . No. I want to hide. I
just want to curl up in a little ball. (69-70)
While she fails at this point to complete the process, the movement of
grace has begun in Vivian. Her self-disclosure in this passage amounts
to a confession. She forsakes self-sufficiency and turns to God. And
what she wants when she speaks the sentence that she cannot bring
herself to finish can be supplied from her own interpretation of "If
poysonous mineralls." What the speaker in the sonnet wanted but could
not bring himself to accept, according to the lecture, was
forgiveness. The hesitation she shows by attempting to follow Donne's
speaker into hiding is temporary, the action of grace having gained
its last needed momentum from her confession.
Edson herself insists that her character does respond in this way:
"finally there's a breakthrough, and it happens in the last ten
seconds of her life" (Carter 26). When asked at a conference why
Vivian is naked at the end of the play, Edson answered, "What else
would you wear to a redemption? It's 'Come as you are!'" (Carter 25).
And fittingly, God completes for Vivian what she, stripped of the
illusion of self-sufficiency, cannot accomplish for herself. To adapt
a Biblical metaphor, she is clothed (only!) in righteousness, but it
is a borrowed outfit.
Not surprisingly, the play's ending has puzzled viewers. Typical and
plain spoken is this response from a generally appreciative reviewer:
The only problem I have personally with Wit is in the perception of
what it's about. As Chalfant [Kathleen Chalfant, the actress who
played Vivian Bearing in a New York production] proclaimed in a recent
interview, the feeling is that the play is about redemption. In this
instance, I simply don't get it. Although it is a staggering artistic
accomplishment, I am definitely not redeemed. As the brilliant mind
and stalwart singular lifestyle of Dr. Bearing is reduced to
dependency on [a] dear but slow-witted nurse - and ignoring the final
gorgeous but obviously theatrical device of the character rising from
her deathbed, throwing off all her clothes and standing bald and naked
facing upward toward a bright white light - I personally could see
only the anguish of loss, not an uplifting experience. (Holder 2)
Holder's problem is that the ending is only redemptive and not merely
theatrical if one sees it as a sign of resurrection and finds the
Resurrection credible. Vivian Bearing can only be remade and newly
whole through a miracle. Clearly, her final gesture is metaphoric, but
the metaphor only offers hope to those who see it with the eyes of
faith. The gesture, we might fairly say, is a kind of promise, just as
Christians from the time of St. Paul have looked on Christ's
resurrection as a promise, the very one which Donne claimed in the
hymn written in his sickness: "Christ has been raised from the dead,
the first fruits of those who have died . . . . For as all die in
Adam, so all will be made alive in Christ" (I Cor. 15:20, 22).
Vivian's renewed and transformed body is neither a happy fantasy nor
an ill-conceived image of a soul's ascension into heaven. Rather, it
is an emblem of hope based upon faith that Jesus' resurrection has
accomplished, in Rowan Williams's words, "A restoration of the world's
wholeness" (72). The process of redemption now begun will be completed
in a future which Christ's resurrection has revealed.
As an ending to Bearing's story, the resurrection gesture could hardly
be more fitting. For, as Donne knew, it is only through this drastic
act of God that the terrible wrongs of life can be set right. Given
the reach of human pride and the finality of death, nothing but the
power of God can save us. This is why both Christian intellectuals
such as Carol Iannone and secular interpreters such as the makers of
the HBO film get the play wrong. It is neither about simple kindness
as Iannone believes, nor can a wishful (and fully clothed!) return to
youth convey Bearing's redemption, as it is made to do in the film
version of the play. The grace to which Edson refers in interviews
must be God's prevenient grace.6 That is, it is only as God is at work
before and in spite of our actions and intentions that redemption is
possible at all. The awful temptation of pride is the refusal to
acknowledge that grace. The miracle of grace is that God overcomes our
pride, even when pride is defended with all the subtlety of wit. And
the ultimate and life-restoring instance of this shocking and
undeserved grace is the Resurrection, in which we may hope to share:
"Therefore that he may raise the Lord throws down."
Wit should be regarded as an expression of what Karl Rahner called
anonymous Christianity, or even more precisely, as one of Karl Barth's
parables of the Kingdom. Although Professor Bearing makes no explicit
connection between the Christian orthodoxy of the Holy Sonnets and her
own crisis, we are invited to see her in that light. And in fact, the
three texts within the text of the play supply that context. Her
redemption at the end does indeed remain what Wheeler calls a
"theatrical lie" unless we see it as participating in the Resurrection
of the One whom the play never names. But if we are willing to grant
that the triune God is at work extra muros ecclesiae, we are free to
let Edson's character bear witness not to the strength of the human
spirit, but to the healing power of Easter.
Notes
1) Frontain maintains that Donne goes so far as to attempt to provoke
God to violent action against him in order to gain assurance that God
has elected him for salvation.
2) This line, the poem's conclusion, is a reworking of the Vulgate
translation of Ps. 146:8. See Shawcross's note, 392.
3) Various critics have placed Donne along a wide band of the
theological spectrum of his time. Most convincing to me is the view
that the mature Donne sought a middle way within Anglicanism, adopting
some of the emphases of moderate or conforming Calvinists without
rejecting the broad mainstream of Catholic theology. Thus the term
"Augustinian" seems most appropriate, especially where the matters of
sin and grace are concerned. See Young and Johnson.
4) Theologian Sarah Coakley explores the connections between sexual
desire and desire for God, using this sonnet as her point of
departure. She chooses this poem precisely because it is so offensive,
particularly in light of feminist concerns. She admires Donne for
making explicit a connection that she believes to be implicit
throughout Trinitarian theology, although she sharply criticizes the
"Western, Augustinian heritage" he represents. See Coakley.
5) On this point, I, at least, find Edson to be an astute theological
critic of Donne, contra Iannone. Although Donne is searing in his
analysis of sin's hold on the human soul, his grasping after the
assurance of faith often seems unsuccessful, and he can only pray for
what he has not received. Mary Arshagouni Papazian argues that this
same emotional experience is registered in the Confessions of
Augustine and the works of John Bunyan (343). See also John Carey's
treatment of Donne's anxiety concerning death.
6) In this way, too, Edson follows Donne (and Augustine). Young makes
a solid case for Donne's unreserved acceptance of the doctrine of
prevenient grace, at the same time that he rejected Calvin's notion of
irresistible grace on the grounds that it denied free will.
Works Cited
Carey, John. John Donne: Life, Mind, and Art. New York: Oxford UP, 1981.
Carter, Betty. "John Donne Meets The Runaway Bunny." Books and Culture
(Sept/Oct 1999): 24-26.
Coakley, Sarah. "'Batter My Heart . . . '? On Sexuality, Spirituality,
and the Christian Doctrine of the Trinity." Graven Images 2 (1995):
74-83.
Donne, John. The Complete Poetry of John Donne. Ed. John T. Shawcross.
Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1967.
Eads, Martha Greene. "Unwitting Redemption in Margaret Edson's Wit."
Christianity and Literature 51:1 (Winter 2002): 241-54.
Edson, Margaret. Wit. New York: Faber and Faber, 1999.
Frontain, Raymond-Jean. "'With a Holy Importunitie, with a Pious
Impudence': John Donne's Attempts to Provoke Election." Journal of the
Rocky Mountain Medieval and Renaissance Association 13 (1992): 85-102.
Gardner, Helen. "The Religious Poetry of John Donne." Excerpted in
John Donne's Poetry. Ed. Arthur L. Clements. New York: Norton, 1992.
282-290.
Holder, Travis Michael. "Wit," Ticket Holders. 19 Jan. 2002 .
Iannone, Carol. "Donne Undone." First Things 100 (February 2000): 12-14.
Johnson, Jeffrey. The Theology of John Donne. Cambridge: Brewer, 1999.
Martini, Adrienne. "The Playwright In Spite of Herself." American
Theatre 16:8 (October 1999): 22.
Papazian, Mary Arshagouni. "Literacy 'Things Indifferent': The Shared
Augustinianism of Donne's Devotions and Bunyan's Grace Abounding."
John Donne's Religious Imagination: Essays in Honor of John T.
Shawcross. Ed. Raymond-Jean Frontain. Conway, AR: U Central AR P,
1995. 324-49.
Wheeler, Edward T. "Continuing the Conversation." Commonweal 126:7
(April 9, 1999): 35.
Williams, Rowan. Resurrection. New York: Pilgrim P, 1984.
Wit. Dir. Mike Nichols. Perf. Emma Thompson, Christopher Lloyd, Eileen
Atkins, Audra McDonald, Harold Pinter. HBO, 2001.
Young, R. V. "Donne's Holy Sonnets and the Theology of Grace" in
"Bright Shootes of Everlastingnesse": The Seventeenth-Century
Religious Lyric. Claude Summers and Ted-Larry Pebworth, eds. Columbia,
MO: U Missouri P, 1987. 20-39.
John D. Sykes, Jr. is a professor of literature and the humanities at
Wingate University, Wingate, North Carolina. He received a PhD in
Religious Studies from the University of Virginia, as well as an MA in
English. He has published several articles in Muse & Spirit and
several reviews for Religious Studies Review. He is currently working
on a book tentatively titled Flannery O'Connor, Walker Percy, and the
Dialogue with Silence.
Copyright Marquette University Winter 2003
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved
Sykes, John D Jr
FOR reasons internal and external to Margaret Edson's play Wit, it is easy to miss the serious dialogue with John Donne's poetry to be found in it. Internally, the last utterance we hear from the dying scholar on the subject of her studies seems to be a rejection - she emphatically does not want to hear Donne recited to her in her extremity, preferring a children's story. Equally telling seems to be the play's condemnation of what a character calls Donne's "salvation anxiety" the endless complicating of God's simple gift of grace. Externally, audiences and reviewers seem resistant to two stark Augustinian themes sounded by the play: the recalcitrance of human pride and the utter graciousness of the Resurrection. I shall argue that far from rejecting Donne, the play grapples with these theological issues in terms largely set by Donne's divine poems.
As readers familiar with the play are aware, Wit presents us with the ordeal into which a distinguished middle-aged scholar of seventeenth century English poetry is plunged when she is diagnosed with deadly ovarian cancer. Assigned for treatment to the research hospital at her university, she is under the care of Dr. Harvey Kelekian, head of medical oncology, but she is most often attended by a former student, Jason Poser, who is now a clinical fellow in oncology, and by Susie Monahan, primary nurse for the cancer inpatient unit. During the entirety of her fatal illness, Vivian Bearing receives but one visitor: Professor E.M. Ashford, her former mentor and predecessor as eminent Donne scholar. Although she is gowned in hospital garb throughout, it is not the medical apparatus surrounding Professor Bearing that provides the primary material for reflection in the play; rather, it is the theological substance to be found in the poems she
has so often anatomized.
In order to make this case, it will be helpful to frame the texts used by Edson with two well known poems that are not quoted in the play. The first is so strikingly apropos that one might easily imagine it to be the Donnean origin of Wit; it is "Hymn to God, My God in My Sicknesse." For in that poem, the speaker, like Vivian Bearing, lies in the grip of a fatal disease from which he does not expect to recover. He describes himself stretched out,
Whilst my Physitians by their love are growne
Cosmographers, and I their Mapp, who lie
Flat on this bed, that by them may be showne
That this is my South-west discoverie
Per fretrum febris, by these streights to die (ll.6-10).
Although this second stanza of the poem is the only one to mention the
physicians, it is clear that we are to envision the entire scene as
one in which they are in close attendance as the speaker contemplates
his soul's last journey. And in view of issues which emerge in Wit,
two aspects of their relation to the patient are worthy of note. One
is that their "love" of the patient has led them to turn him into a
"Mapp." With the best of intentions, they have reduced his body to a
series of signs which they may read. Secondly, their prognosis seems
to be a given. The patient will die. The only question that frets them
is, how? By what strait will the soul make its exit from one life to
the next?
The connections between these physicians and those who attend Edson's
Donne scholar are easily drawn. Dr. Kelekian and his team know
perfectly well that patients do not survive stage four metastatic
ovarian cancer. From the time Vivian receives her diagnosis, her
prognosis is certain. Thus, their "love" for her quickly turns her
into a set of signs to be read. How long can they keep her alive? How
many chemo treatments can she withstand? What can they learn about her
"febris" as they chart her passage through it? Bearing herself is
acutely aware of the nature of this interest. And the irony of the
fact that the medical doctors are doing to her what she has so often
done to a literal text in the past is borne out to her when she is
visited on Grand Rounds. As she observes the medical observers she
muses:
Full of subservience, hierarchy, gratuitous displays, sublimated
rivalries - I feel right at home. It is just like a graduate seminar.
With one important difference: in Grand Rounds, they read me like a
book. Once I did the teaching, now I am taught. (37)
This moment of self-recognition on Dr. Bearing's part is also mirrored
in Donne's poem. For while his physicians determine the manner of his
death, Donne contemplates its meaning. And so Vivian, too, is forced
to face in existential terms what for her medical colleagues remains a
matter of research. Her attention must be turned so that she, too,
will "thinke here before" what "I must doe then."
Such a turning to the business of preparation for death is precisely
what Vivian needs. Unlike the speaker in Donne's poem, Bearing is not
ready to look beyond the horizons of the world in which she has
successfully made her way. Thus the poem is not only descriptive of
Vivian's state as an object of research laid out before her doctors;
it is also theologically prescriptive, charting the course she must
follow. Her own spiritual self-examination must be as rigorous as the
scrutiny her physicians employ. And it will be painful. As Vivian says
after eight months of treatment, "[I]t is highly educational. I am
learning to suffer" (31). Given Bearing's ironic tone it is easy to
miss the fact that here she speaks the plain truth. Within the
Augustinian context established by the Divine Poems she knows so well,
suffering, insofar as it leads to self-examination and helps to defeat
pride, is a blessing.
But "Hymne to God my God, in my sicknesse" is predictive of the play
in one final way. Unlike much of Donne's religious poetry, this poem
may be said to surmount the doubt of salvation that accompanies acute
awareness of sin.1 The central assertion of the poem is that "death
doth touch the Resurrection": just as on a world map the opposite
edges (east and west) indicate the same line, so the end of this life
is the beginning of the new. And the key to this paradox is Christ's
resurrection, the means by which, in Christian reckoning, death is
overcome by new life that utterly supplants it. The speaker in the
poem asks God to account him one of Christ's own; he prays for his
suffering to be identified with Christ's, so that he may also share in
Christ's glory ("By these thornes give me his other Crowne"). Thus
this hymn may be said to adumbrate Wit's surprising conclusion, when
Vivian Bearing's death is succeeded by a resurrection gesture: she
gets up from her deathbed, her clothes fall away from her, and she
reaches upward toward the light. In this image, indeed, "death doth
touch the Resurrection."
Since "Hymne to God my God in my sicknesse" contains both the medical
setting to be found in the play and the resurrection telos towards
which the play points, I will suggest that it also provides a fitting
motto for Vivian Bearing's spiritual pilgrimage: "Therefore that he
may raise the Lord throws down."2 Without death, there is no
resurrection. Even so, joyful allegiance to God comes only after
self-centered pride has been conquered. In the spirit of the
Augustinian tradition to which he belongs,3 Donne believes pride,
understood as rebellious indifference to God, to be the root of human
sin. And so deeply rooted is this pride that only God's intervention
cun dig it out. Since sin's reach extends throughout our being,
extracting it is painful. Adversity and even suffering thus
paradoxically become occasions for thanksgiving, for they are signs of
God's radical surgery.
This lesson, implicit in so much of Donne's work, is most boldly
taught in a second Divine Poem that Vivian does not mention. Perhaps
the most offensive of Donne's Holy Sonnets to modern sensibility is
"Batter my heart."4 For it not only condones human suffering, but
demands it from God's hand as the only corrective to sin. It is not
sufficient for God merely to "seek to mend" the speaker's heart as a
tinker might mend a pot; God must beat, fire, and remake the vessel
entirely if it is to be once again serviceable to its maker. In the
two paradoxes that close the poem the speaker asks God to "enthrall"
(enslave) him in order to free him, and to "ravish" him in order to
make him chaste. Battery, slavery, rape - these horrors of human
conduct are employed as metaphors of God's dealings with those he
loves. In a sermon, Donne provides a rationale for such unlikely love.
It is much worse for us, notes Donne, if God does not punish us than
if he does, for to be spared means that He has forgotten us. How
woeful we are if God, "forbearing to take knowledge of our
transgressions, . . . shall say of us, as he does of Israel, Why
should ye be smitten any more?" For this happens only "when God leaves
us to our selves, and studies our recovery no farther, by any more
corrections . . . ." (qtd. in Gardner 283).
This notion that suffering may indeed be a vehicle of God's mercy is
crucial to an understanding of Wit. And in fact, it may be no
coincidence that Dame Helen Gardner provides the sermon quotation
above immediately after quoting from, "If poysonous mineralls," the
Holy Sonnet that is the subject of Vivian Bearing's lecture in the
play. For both Donne and Gardner's scholarship loom large in this
work. What has largely gone unappreciated about the play in the
commentary that has so far appeared is that Professor Bearing herself
undergoes an inner religious drama remarkably like one portrayed in
the sonnets in which she is expert. Her suffering during her ordeal
with ovarian cancer and its treatment is, as Donne suggests, a means
to correction, and ultimately salvation. Just as it is difficult for
modern sensibility to accept Donne's drastic metaphors in "Batter my
heart," so audiences resist the suggestion that Vivian Bearing's
ordeal might actually be a needed antidote to that form of sin Donne
knew so well, pride. And equally startling is the gesture of
resurrection at the end of the play, which like the grace which Donne
anxiously doubts, offers the full redemption neither she nor her
doctors can supply.
In interviews, Margaret Edson has expressed mild surprise that critics
have not paid more attention to the religious aspect of her play: "The
play is about redemption, and I'm surprised no one mentions it. Grace
is the opportunity to experience God in spite of yourself, which is
what Dr. Bearing ultimately achieves" (Martini 24). Despite notable
exceptions in essays by Betty Carter and especially Martha Greene
Eads, most commentators have fastened upon the medical aspects of the
play. Victims of ovarian cancer have used it as a rallying point.
Medical professionals have employed it to discuss patient rights and
research ethics. In several American cities, sold out performances
have been followed by lengthy talk-back sessions that have focused on
these issues. The play thus seems valuable to much of its audience for
its realistic portrayal of courageous suffering and its attack on the
indifference of doctors. But Edson is right to be surprised. At its
moral center, the play is not about kindness, but redemption.
Despite what at least two critics (Iannone and Wheeler) have claimed,
there is a clear connection between the spiritual crisis Bearing faces
and the poetry she studies. Like the Donne of the Holy Sonnets, she is
unable to trust God, in large part because she lacks the humility to
do so. For example, Dr. Bearing is much more like her physicians than
unlike them. In her absorption in research she resembles Kelekian and
his research fellow Jason. Like them, she is ambitious, having worked
her way to a position of eminence in her profession, of which she is
understandably proud. Her callousness to students anticipates Jason's
indifference to bedside manner. When her former student turned
physician prepares her for a pelvic exam and leaves her, feet still in
stirrups and knees spread apart while he searches the hall for a
nurse, Vivian can only wryly register that she wishes she had given
him an "A." This observation seems to acknowledge that while power
relationships have been reversed, she has been as ruthless in her own
arena as the callow doctor. Further, her reliance upon "wit" keeps her
at a distance from others and initially increases her suffering. She
has made no friends and has no remaining family. Her only visitor is
the faculty mentor who originally inspired her, the Gardner-like Prof.
Ashford.
Thus, in the long run, her illness humiliates her in an edifying
sense, breaking down her pride to prepare her for a childlike faith.
Although Bearing does not invite God's excruciating remediation, as
Donne does when he asks God to "breake, blowe, burn and make me new,"
the ordeal of cancer ultimately has this effect on the once aloof
professor. In other words, the secularized exegete is made to follow
the Augustinian trajectory described by her subject: God raises up
only those whom he has first cast down. As terrible as it sounds to
contemporary ears accustomed to regarding suffering as pure evil,
Vivian's pain is a good thing. Her suffering brings salvation. To
borrow the title of Tim McLaurin's novel, she is cured by fire.
Taking our cue from Dr. Bearing herself, we can turn to the texts
within the text of the play to "read" the progress of her soul. The
first important text is delivered in a flashback from Bearing's
college days; it is "death, be not proud." Bearing remembers a
confrontation with her great mentor Prof. Ashford over textual
accuracy. Prof. Ashford informs the young Vivian in stern tones that
she has used the wrong edition for her paper on the most famous of the
Holy Sonnets. In the edition Vivian used, the punctuation is
incorrect. Instead of a semi-colon and exclamation point, the final
assertion of the poem should be preceded by a comma and followed by a
period: "death, thou shalt die." In this way, Ashford explains,
"Nothing but a breath - a comma - separates life from life
everlasting." The application of this point as it arises later in
connection with Vivian's illness is that death is to be accepted as a
part of life, the final victory over it having been secured. Thus, the
individual need not approach it with inflated drama. Rather, quiet
confidence is in order. Secondarily, Prof. Ashford urges her pupil to
curb her inclination to approach life's difficulties as intellectual
puzzles to be solved. After the brief lecture on textual accuracy,
Vivian mistakenly concludes that what the poem says about death is
simply a metaphysical conceit. "It's wit!" she declares. Her older and
wiser teacher disagrees. The poem, she insists, is about life and
truth. She urges Vivian to turn aside from her paper for the afternoon
and enjoy her friends, thus gaining the experience that will free her
from over-intellectualizing. But Vivian returns to the library.
The second text examined in the play is one that Prof. Bearing herself
analyzes. It is another Holy Sonnet - one in which she sees mirrored
what we come to know as her own wit-ful anxiety. In her remembered
classroom explication of "If poysonous mineralls" the professor
stresses that in Donne's poems, "metaphysical quandaries are
addressed, but never resolved" (48). The speaker in this poem, she
argues, begins with the brash certainty that God will not punish human
sin if He overlooks the deadly actions of poisons and serpents. But
the poet quickly loses his nerve. Recognizing the heinousness of his
own sin and the reality of God's judgment, he is gripped by fear, and
instead of pleading for God's mercy, asks that God forget him: "when
the speaker considers his own sins and the inevitability of God's
judgment, he can conceive of but one resolution: to disappear" (50).
What the speaker skips over, in other words, is the obvious and simple
solution that he has only to accept God's forgiveness. But this he
apparently cannot do.
We might describe the speaker's failure as a lack of faith. Unable to
escape judgment through wit, he cannot admit that God might extend the
salvation he cannot supply for himself. Rather than trust to God's
mercy, he prefers to hide. And in the course of the play, we are meant
to see that this is precisely Vivian's situation. Here we come to the
second important theological concept registered in Wit. The pride
which led her to that state of isolation characteristic of sin has but
one cure, and she cannot avail herself of it. Plainly, Vivian is a
victim of both cancer and her doctors. Equally obvious is her courage.
But most important of all is the fact that her loneliness is
self-inflicted. Like Ivan Ilych before her, but most particularly like
the Donne she creates for her students, Vivian's greatest obstacle as
she faces death is her own pride. The point is borne out in a subtle
way by the fact that immediately after the reverie in which she
recalls her lecture - indeed before she has finished it - she is
summoned out of her room for an ultrasound. "It should not be now,"
she insists. "I am in the middle of - this. I have this planned for
now, not ultrasound" (51). Since this exchange calls attention to the
intrusiveness of hospital procedures, it is easy to miss that Vivian
resents any imposition on the imperious control she has exerted over
her life. Distinguished professors are not used to having their
lectures interrupted. And it is not only physicians, but more
profoundly mortality that has wrested control from Vivian's hands.
Of course, Vivian would be mistaken to place her ultimate trust in
modern medicine. But she would be equally misguided to attempt to
regain her old autonomy. The hard spiritual lesson of her ordeal is
that her position has been false all along. This is the point of the
final text she hears - a text that is the product not of wit but of
wisdom. When Vivian's old mentor comes to visit her in her extremity,
she has with her a children's book, bought for her great-grandson. It
is this book the enfeebled Vivian wants to hear, not recitations of
Donne. This final text, explicated by Vivian's mentor, provides a neat
contrast to Vivian's own virtuoso interpretation of Donne's sonnet.
The book is simple where Donne is complex, reassuring rather than
provoking. But it is also profound, as Prof. Ashford explains, for it
is a testament to faith, and thus offers the spiritual medicine that
Vivian most needs.
This final text is The Runaway Bunny by Margaret Wise Brown. In it,
the bunny tells his mother he is going to assume a new shape and run
away. But regardless of the guises he proposes, the mother has an
answer: "'I will be a bird and fly away from you,' says the bunny. 'If
you become a bird and fly away from me,' said his mother, 'I will be a
tree you come home to.'" Finally, the would-be truant gives up:
"'Shucks,' said the little bunny, 'I might just as well stay where I
am and be your little bunny.' And so he did" (80).
The message for Vivian is twofold. First, this simple tale is an
antidote to the anxiety-producing complexity of Donne and the
competitive interpretative hubris to which Vivian and her medical
counterparts have fallen prey.5 The straightforward consolation of the
children's book is very much like that of the orange popsicle Vivian
shares with the sympathetic nurse, Susie. But secondly, the book
offers a directly theological affirmation. Prof. Ashford sees in this
tale, "A little allegory of the soul. No matter where it hides, God
will find it" (80). Thus the hopefulness of the book springs not from
human kindness, but from trust in God's overriding mercy. Not only is
the manner of the story contrary to Donne, but its content provides an
answer to the fearful sonnet explicated earlier by Prof. Bearing: it
is impossible to hide from God, but also unnecessary. One has only to
relinquish one's defenses to find the security they could never
provide.
Precisely this theological message is suggested by Prof. Ashford's
final words, and by Vivian's triumphant gesture at the conclusion of
the play. When Prof. Ashford finishes reading the book, Vivian has
drifted into a childlike sleep. Before she leaves, Prof. Ashford
pronounces what amounts to a benediction: "It's time to go. And
flights of angels sing thee to thy rest." While the Shakespeare
quotation seems strictly conventional, these words are fraught with
meaning. For it is Vivian's time to "go" as well, and the request for
angel song is a prayer for the dying consonant with the "little
allegory of the soul" we have just heard.
These words also provide the framework for Vivian's last, symbolic
action in the play. Rising from her bed, the woman we know from the
pronouncements of the medical staff to be dead walks toward a light
and begins removing her few garments. At last she lets fall her
hospital gown, and according to the stage direction, stands "naked,
and beautiful, reaching for the light" (85). Given the context of
Donne, The Runaway Bunny, and Prof. Ashford's benediction, this action
must be seen as a sign of resurrection, when as St. Paul says, "We
shall be raised incorruptible." And the fact that it is the power of
God that allows Vivian so to rise is underscored by the medical defeat
that precedes her triumphant gesture. Jason Posner, the brash young
resident, has ignored the "do not resuscitate" order on Vivian's
chart, and vainly summoned the code team. After belatedly recognizing
the order, he collapses in chagrin, and tellingly murmurs, "Oh, God,"
in unwitting testimony to the real agent of Vivian's salvation.
IN Margaret Edson's play, God eschews the manner of the hound of
heaven for the way of a mother, refusing to let us outrun the bounds
of divine love. Although Vivian Bearing's victory over the pride that
separates her from God's grace is never registered in a moment of
conscious renunciation, it is begun in her acceptance of her friends'
sympathy. And indeed, the audience has been prepared for her
transformation by an earlier moment of self-reflection that recalls
her reading of "If poysonous mineralls." After confessing her fear and
confusion to Susie, Vivian shares a popsicle with the nurse and with
her help comes to the decision not to be resuscitated should her heart
stop. Vivian comments on this exchange:
Now is not the time for verbal swordplay, for unlikely flights of
imagination and wildly shifting perspectives, for metaphysical
conceit, for wit.
And nothing would be worse than a detailed scholarly analysis.
Erudition. Interpretation. Complication.
Now is a time for simplicity. Now is a time for, dare I say it, kindness.
I thought being extremely smart would take care of it. But I see that
I have been found out. Ooohhh.
I'm scared. Oh, God. I want . . . I want . . . No. I want to hide. I
just want to curl up in a little ball. (69-70)
While she fails at this point to complete the process, the movement of
grace has begun in Vivian. Her self-disclosure in this passage amounts
to a confession. She forsakes self-sufficiency and turns to God. And
what she wants when she speaks the sentence that she cannot bring
herself to finish can be supplied from her own interpretation of "If
poysonous mineralls." What the speaker in the sonnet wanted but could
not bring himself to accept, according to the lecture, was
forgiveness. The hesitation she shows by attempting to follow Donne's
speaker into hiding is temporary, the action of grace having gained
its last needed momentum from her confession.
Edson herself insists that her character does respond in this way:
"finally there's a breakthrough, and it happens in the last ten
seconds of her life" (Carter 26). When asked at a conference why
Vivian is naked at the end of the play, Edson answered, "What else
would you wear to a redemption? It's 'Come as you are!'" (Carter 25).
And fittingly, God completes for Vivian what she, stripped of the
illusion of self-sufficiency, cannot accomplish for herself. To adapt
a Biblical metaphor, she is clothed (only!) in righteousness, but it
is a borrowed outfit.
Not surprisingly, the play's ending has puzzled viewers. Typical and
plain spoken is this response from a generally appreciative reviewer:
The only problem I have personally with Wit is in the perception of
what it's about. As Chalfant [Kathleen Chalfant, the actress who
played Vivian Bearing in a New York production] proclaimed in a recent
interview, the feeling is that the play is about redemption. In this
instance, I simply don't get it. Although it is a staggering artistic
accomplishment, I am definitely not redeemed. As the brilliant mind
and stalwart singular lifestyle of Dr. Bearing is reduced to
dependency on [a] dear but slow-witted nurse - and ignoring the final
gorgeous but obviously theatrical device of the character rising from
her deathbed, throwing off all her clothes and standing bald and naked
facing upward toward a bright white light - I personally could see
only the anguish of loss, not an uplifting experience. (Holder 2)
Holder's problem is that the ending is only redemptive and not merely
theatrical if one sees it as a sign of resurrection and finds the
Resurrection credible. Vivian Bearing can only be remade and newly
whole through a miracle. Clearly, her final gesture is metaphoric, but
the metaphor only offers hope to those who see it with the eyes of
faith. The gesture, we might fairly say, is a kind of promise, just as
Christians from the time of St. Paul have looked on Christ's
resurrection as a promise, the very one which Donne claimed in the
hymn written in his sickness: "Christ has been raised from the dead,
the first fruits of those who have died . . . . For as all die in
Adam, so all will be made alive in Christ" (I Cor. 15:20, 22).
Vivian's renewed and transformed body is neither a happy fantasy nor
an ill-conceived image of a soul's ascension into heaven. Rather, it
is an emblem of hope based upon faith that Jesus' resurrection has
accomplished, in Rowan Williams's words, "A restoration of the world's
wholeness" (72). The process of redemption now begun will be completed
in a future which Christ's resurrection has revealed.
As an ending to Bearing's story, the resurrection gesture could hardly
be more fitting. For, as Donne knew, it is only through this drastic
act of God that the terrible wrongs of life can be set right. Given
the reach of human pride and the finality of death, nothing but the
power of God can save us. This is why both Christian intellectuals
such as Carol Iannone and secular interpreters such as the makers of
the HBO film get the play wrong. It is neither about simple kindness
as Iannone believes, nor can a wishful (and fully clothed!) return to
youth convey Bearing's redemption, as it is made to do in the film
version of the play. The grace to which Edson refers in interviews
must be God's prevenient grace.6 That is, it is only as God is at work
before and in spite of our actions and intentions that redemption is
possible at all. The awful temptation of pride is the refusal to
acknowledge that grace. The miracle of grace is that God overcomes our
pride, even when pride is defended with all the subtlety of wit. And
the ultimate and life-restoring instance of this shocking and
undeserved grace is the Resurrection, in which we may hope to share:
"Therefore that he may raise the Lord throws down."
Wit should be regarded as an expression of what Karl Rahner called
anonymous Christianity, or even more precisely, as one of Karl Barth's
parables of the Kingdom. Although Professor Bearing makes no explicit
connection between the Christian orthodoxy of the Holy Sonnets and her
own crisis, we are invited to see her in that light. And in fact, the
three texts within the text of the play supply that context. Her
redemption at the end does indeed remain what Wheeler calls a
"theatrical lie" unless we see it as participating in the Resurrection
of the One whom the play never names. But if we are willing to grant
that the triune God is at work extra muros ecclesiae, we are free to
let Edson's character bear witness not to the strength of the human
spirit, but to the healing power of Easter.
Notes
1) Frontain maintains that Donne goes so far as to attempt to provoke
God to violent action against him in order to gain assurance that God
has elected him for salvation.
2) This line, the poem's conclusion, is a reworking of the Vulgate
translation of Ps. 146:8. See Shawcross's note, 392.
3) Various critics have placed Donne along a wide band of the
theological spectrum of his time. Most convincing to me is the view
that the mature Donne sought a middle way within Anglicanism, adopting
some of the emphases of moderate or conforming Calvinists without
rejecting the broad mainstream of Catholic theology. Thus the term
"Augustinian" seems most appropriate, especially where the matters of
sin and grace are concerned. See Young and Johnson.
4) Theologian Sarah Coakley explores the connections between sexual
desire and desire for God, using this sonnet as her point of
departure. She chooses this poem precisely because it is so offensive,
particularly in light of feminist concerns. She admires Donne for
making explicit a connection that she believes to be implicit
throughout Trinitarian theology, although she sharply criticizes the
"Western, Augustinian heritage" he represents. See Coakley.
5) On this point, I, at least, find Edson to be an astute theological
critic of Donne, contra Iannone. Although Donne is searing in his
analysis of sin's hold on the human soul, his grasping after the
assurance of faith often seems unsuccessful, and he can only pray for
what he has not received. Mary Arshagouni Papazian argues that this
same emotional experience is registered in the Confessions of
Augustine and the works of John Bunyan (343). See also John Carey's
treatment of Donne's anxiety concerning death.
6) In this way, too, Edson follows Donne (and Augustine). Young makes
a solid case for Donne's unreserved acceptance of the doctrine of
prevenient grace, at the same time that he rejected Calvin's notion of
irresistible grace on the grounds that it denied free will.
Works Cited
Carey, John. John Donne: Life, Mind, and Art. New York: Oxford UP, 1981.
Carter, Betty. "John Donne Meets The Runaway Bunny." Books and Culture
(Sept/Oct 1999): 24-26.
Coakley, Sarah. "'Batter My Heart . . . '? On Sexuality, Spirituality,
and the Christian Doctrine of the Trinity." Graven Images 2 (1995):
74-83.
Donne, John. The Complete Poetry of John Donne. Ed. John T. Shawcross.
Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1967.
Eads, Martha Greene. "Unwitting Redemption in Margaret Edson's Wit."
Christianity and Literature 51:1 (Winter 2002): 241-54.
Edson, Margaret. Wit. New York: Faber and Faber, 1999.
Frontain, Raymond-Jean. "'With a Holy Importunitie, with a Pious
Impudence': John Donne's Attempts to Provoke Election." Journal of the
Rocky Mountain Medieval and Renaissance Association 13 (1992): 85-102.
Gardner, Helen. "The Religious Poetry of John Donne." Excerpted in
John Donne's Poetry. Ed. Arthur L. Clements. New York: Norton, 1992.
282-290.
Holder, Travis Michael. "Wit," Ticket Holders. 19 Jan. 2002 .
Iannone, Carol. "Donne Undone." First Things 100 (February 2000): 12-14.
Johnson, Jeffrey. The Theology of John Donne. Cambridge: Brewer, 1999.
Martini, Adrienne. "The Playwright In Spite of Herself." American
Theatre 16:8 (October 1999): 22.
Papazian, Mary Arshagouni. "Literacy 'Things Indifferent': The Shared
Augustinianism of Donne's Devotions and Bunyan's Grace Abounding."
John Donne's Religious Imagination: Essays in Honor of John T.
Shawcross. Ed. Raymond-Jean Frontain. Conway, AR: U Central AR P,
1995. 324-49.
Wheeler, Edward T. "Continuing the Conversation." Commonweal 126:7
(April 9, 1999): 35.
Williams, Rowan. Resurrection. New York: Pilgrim P, 1984.
Wit. Dir. Mike Nichols. Perf. Emma Thompson, Christopher Lloyd, Eileen
Atkins, Audra McDonald, Harold Pinter. HBO, 2001.
Young, R. V. "Donne's Holy Sonnets and the Theology of Grace" in
"Bright Shootes of Everlastingnesse": The Seventeenth-Century
Religious Lyric. Claude Summers and Ted-Larry Pebworth, eds. Columbia,
MO: U Missouri P, 1987. 20-39.
John D. Sykes, Jr. is a professor of literature and the humanities at
Wingate University, Wingate, North Carolina. He received a PhD in
Religious Studies from the University of Virginia, as well as an MA in
English. He has published several articles in Muse & Spirit and
several reviews for Religious Studies Review. He is currently working
on a book tentatively titled Flannery O'Connor, Walker Percy, and the
Dialogue with Silence.
Copyright Marquette University Winter 2003
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved